It’s a widely held myth, perpetuated by the Mainstream Media that the gun manufacturers are responsible for all of the unfortunate school tragedies. While that couldn’t be farther from the truth, many of our liberal anti-gun brethren have been spreading that lie to anyone who has ears to hear. A child is more likely to be a victim of violence, without the threat of being shot with a bullet from a gun, than getting shot by a classmate. Many cases of domestic violence and child abuse don’t involve handguns, or any kind of wea
pons, but are violent nonetheless.
Where is the public outcry for the women and children who suffer from abuse at the hands of their loved ones? Why doesn’t the government try to mandate the perpetrators of abuse, who don’t employ handguns? Guns are blamed for everything under the sun, when, in fact, guns are not programmed to be violent. The people with the intention for evil are violent, and they should be the ones who should be tracked and controlled.
Eliminating guns does not make violence disappear. As much as the Mainstream Media sensationalizes gun violence strories, the truth always reveals itself. And that truth is the perpetrator is always a twisted and conflicted soul who believes that evil is the way to go. Getting rid of guns in order to protect students is akin to the argument that all schools should close because they attract violent people. It just doesn’t make sense, and isn’t logical, nor reasonable.
