Archive for category obama

Blair Holt Bill

In February 2009, the House of Representatives introduced the Blair Holt bill, also known as HR 45.  Among some of the proposals within this bill are:  testing before being able to obtain a firearm, being required by the federal authorities to notify them of a move, since you have bought a firearm, being subject to visits by the federal authorities to verify that the firearm is secured in the presence of children and last, but definitely not least, is the proposal of testing, to be determined by the federal authorities, during the 5 year period of licensing.  And those are just the salient facts that come from reading the bill.  After a thorough, line by line reading, you can be sure that there is more to be found, or rather, less rights to bear arms.

2nd ammendment as we remembered it

2nd ammendment as we remembered it

If the proposal of this bill doesn’t clearly show the direction that our new Presidential administration wants to direct the country to, then your optimism regarding the 2nd ammendment is to be commended or envied.  If you are skeptical or cynical, at best, of President Obama’s approach to eroding the 2nd ammendment right to bear arms, then, unfortunately, welcome to the “Hope and Change” you believed in to vote for him as the President.  With a virtually filibuster proof Democratic Congress, and newly confirmed SCOTUS pick Sonia Sotomayor, 2nd ammendment rights which were during times past were deemed, “constitutional”, can now be construed as “abstract”.  Let’s hope that rational reason and thought win abstract thinking during these tough times.

No Comments

Home invasions and our President

In a perfect world, we wouldn’t need weapons, guns, knives, clubs, or samurai swords, for that matter.  But everyone of us knows that we don’t live in a perfect world, which is why knives and samurai swords, were invented in the first place.  So, for the most part, the honest folks who own guns, are realists who aren’t provoking violence, but keep them in the event that they might need to protect themselves.

When statistics are twisted in order to make the gun control advocates look like they are protecting our way of living, do their statistics ever reflect prevention of violence on due to a potential victim owning a gun?  Case in point, a homeowner is in danger of being robbed in their own house.  The homeowner has every right to self-defense in their own house.  A violent crime was prevented because the would-be robber was deterred by the homeowner.  Can that statistic be recorded?

Fighting for our rights

Fighting for our rights

Now, let’s look at a bill that our President voted against while he was a senator, back in 2004.  A homeowner, acting in self-defense, injured a burglar.  He was tried in court, but charges dropped.  Senate bill 2165 was introduced due to the court case so citizens at home could defend themselves.  Then senator Obama opposed the bill, against citizens defending themselves in March 2004.  November 2004, up for a vote again, then senator Obama voted against it again.  Luckily the Illinois house overrode his decision.  The debate continues, now he’s the President, but he’s still against guns.

No Comments